well, the tories are in............ so lets get back to the science.
In six weeks time i will be attending the annual International Geobiology workshop, held by USC and sponsored by none other than the Agouron institute, NSF and NASA to name a few. The course allows 20 young scientist from around the world to attend an intensive 5 week introduction to early earth evolution, mixing field work, lab work and a lecture series into this extraordinary course.
The problem/challenge i've found i've always wanted help with was getting ideas into making travel fund applications stand out, especially when in times of hardship it may be that some funding is getting cut in societies and research councils. I've always wanted to start a good comprehensive list of places for young geoscientists to look to help with funding, so as its my blog, im gonna do it!
Previous societities i have been successful with, and who have been extremely helpful with all my requests in the past include:
UKRC- Women in SET - Travel/Training Grants
British Mass Spectrometry Society - Student Travel Bursaries
Geochemical Society - for help attending Goldschmidt conference
Mineralogical Society - Travel Grants
i'll add more as i go along, feel free to mention more and ill keep adding to the list! ill make a separate list for other science funding too
Axxx
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
Thursday, 6 May 2010
The morning after.......
well, we are heading to a hung Parliament! I can see the benefits of this system especially when it really would represent the views of everyone within the country, rather than a very slim majority...
so a definite hung Parliament, but does this mean a fair vote or infighting with no decisions being made........
Policies in all parties seem to focus around 1. the better education of school stage students in SET subjects by relocating funds for better science teachers, by removing the golden handshake deal young teaching students receive and replacing this incentive with the payment of student loans in an effort to retain teachers to stay in the profession for longer......
2. ensuring budgets to research councils are maintained over a multi-year arc in order to encourage and maintain a level climate for the next term, and engaging in the Haldane principle that allows research monies to be allocated where science experts believe it best to be utilised, not determined by the government. Both Lib Dem and Conservative seek to freeze the REF assessments in order to assess the advantage of linking university funding to research, and the impact this has on blue skies research at a basic level.
The importance of women in science and research has also been focused on, with a push from the lib dems to increase the support for young female students looking to take up SET roles within universities, with also support and research into the gap between young female scientist requiring to take career breaks, and the impact this has on career.
Questions remain over other factors such as the widely publicised closure of science departments are the country with less enrollment into physics and chemistry than ever before. This leaves the community in limbo, as a cycle of weakening recruitment from school level to university level to postgraduate and doctoral level leaves a gap in experienced, knowledgeable, motivated scientists which will drive the field on. there is a split between encouraging PHD projects to become more industrial friendly, with a wider application to entrepreneurship, but there must also be a focus on those willing and motivated to stay within the confinds of a university research laboratory pushing the bounds of pure science. Would it not be sensible to engage the separation of those willing to lecture and those who intend to stay in research and support each individually?
the next days are to make very interesting waiting..............
so a definite hung Parliament, but does this mean a fair vote or infighting with no decisions being made........
Policies in all parties seem to focus around 1. the better education of school stage students in SET subjects by relocating funds for better science teachers, by removing the golden handshake deal young teaching students receive and replacing this incentive with the payment of student loans in an effort to retain teachers to stay in the profession for longer......
2. ensuring budgets to research councils are maintained over a multi-year arc in order to encourage and maintain a level climate for the next term, and engaging in the Haldane principle that allows research monies to be allocated where science experts believe it best to be utilised, not determined by the government. Both Lib Dem and Conservative seek to freeze the REF assessments in order to assess the advantage of linking university funding to research, and the impact this has on blue skies research at a basic level.
The importance of women in science and research has also been focused on, with a push from the lib dems to increase the support for young female students looking to take up SET roles within universities, with also support and research into the gap between young female scientist requiring to take career breaks, and the impact this has on career.
Questions remain over other factors such as the widely publicised closure of science departments are the country with less enrollment into physics and chemistry than ever before. This leaves the community in limbo, as a cycle of weakening recruitment from school level to university level to postgraduate and doctoral level leaves a gap in experienced, knowledgeable, motivated scientists which will drive the field on. there is a split between encouraging PHD projects to become more industrial friendly, with a wider application to entrepreneurship, but there must also be a focus on those willing and motivated to stay within the confinds of a university research laboratory pushing the bounds of pure science. Would it not be sensible to engage the separation of those willing to lecture and those who intend to stay in research and support each individually?
the next days are to make very interesting waiting..............
*ELECTION!!!!!*
here we go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..................... Labour win in Houghton and Sunderland South!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
one down, 649 to go.
so who says what........ive tried to compile a list of each parties science policies.......
..................... Labour win in Houghton and Sunderland South!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
one down, 649 to go.
so who says what........ive tried to compile a list of each parties science policies.......
*ELECTION!!!*
.......its a miserable night for an election, im cosied up in bed watching the bbc 1 coverage!
bets are on.
Even though there have been debates over the debates, making the party leaders personable has been key to engaging youth into politics, X Factor? yes, Increasing youth votes? DEFINITELY!
i wonder how much the BBC spend on those awful graphics.........
Exit pole says Hung Parliment!!!! conservative in!!!!! labour into second, libdems into third.......
now for proper results please.
Will the maccams be the first constituency in with the count?!
bets are on.
Even though there have been debates over the debates, making the party leaders personable has been key to engaging youth into politics, X Factor? yes, Increasing youth votes? DEFINITELY!
i wonder how much the BBC spend on those awful graphics.........
Exit pole says Hung Parliment!!!! conservative in!!!!! labour into second, libdems into third.......
now for proper results please.
Will the maccams be the first constituency in with the count?!
final countdown.....
well..........the time is finally here!
in just under one hour polling stations across the land close and a maddash of counting begins, heralding what is being seen as one of the biggest changes to british politics in over 30 years. It is a time of mass enthusiasm from a young generation who are finally being engaged into the world of politics, being made aware of who does what for our country and why, and personally i have never been included in so many discussions about politics in all the years ive been able to vote (ill keep that one secret...), and i have never had felt such strong will to vote from this countries youth, its an exciting time indeed.
along with stong feelings and enthusims comes stong divided opinions on the right leaders for this country. it would be improper to blog from a bias point of view, but more pressing is the need to discuss the importance of these parties views on Science, Engineering, Technology, British Research Council funding, University Research funding and jobs for young science graduates.
ill be posting throughout the night (whilst writing my thesis) about the main policies Labour, Lib Dem and Conservatives have dicussed in recent debates.
What i can tell you from young researchers and scientists within my community is that people are worried for the future of research, about funding cuts and the place britain will retain in an international community of science. but as long as there are strongly opinionated people will for a positive change to happen, a new generation of scientists may be the strongest to come out of britain yet!
Ax
in just under one hour polling stations across the land close and a maddash of counting begins, heralding what is being seen as one of the biggest changes to british politics in over 30 years. It is a time of mass enthusiasm from a young generation who are finally being engaged into the world of politics, being made aware of who does what for our country and why, and personally i have never been included in so many discussions about politics in all the years ive been able to vote (ill keep that one secret...), and i have never had felt such strong will to vote from this countries youth, its an exciting time indeed.
along with stong feelings and enthusims comes stong divided opinions on the right leaders for this country. it would be improper to blog from a bias point of view, but more pressing is the need to discuss the importance of these parties views on Science, Engineering, Technology, British Research Council funding, University Research funding and jobs for young science graduates.
its hard to deciefer how wide and varied parties will spread their science policies, it is important to remember the area covers all manor of scientific disciplines; drug control, ethics of stem cell research, the environment, climate change and of a more local issue , flooding, nuclear power and energy.....the list goes on....
ill be posting throughout the night (whilst writing my thesis) about the main policies Labour, Lib Dem and Conservatives have dicussed in recent debates.
What i can tell you from young researchers and scientists within my community is that people are worried for the future of research, about funding cuts and the place britain will retain in an international community of science. but as long as there are strongly opinionated people will for a positive change to happen, a new generation of scientists may be the strongest to come out of britain yet!
Here is a fantastic link to a website arguing the case for the ScienceVote http://blog.sciencecampaign.org.uk/
Ax
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
Voting scientifically
Ben Goldacre highlights some ways of disseminating data to help those struggling to decide who to vote for.
He also points out what a plonker David Cameron is.
Monday, 26 April 2010
Jack of all trades and master of none?
Things you may not know about me: I speak a little french, I have attended acting classes, I have taken a short course in swedish massage, I have a cooking magazine subscription, I have just started sewing classes (so I can do dress making in Summer), and plan on starting a DIY course in October. Or I am a bilingual drama queen with strong hands that does a mean morrocan chicken, wearing old cushion covers as a shirt, eyeing up your plumbing. But am I any good at any of them or does being distinctly average at many things give me the upper hand?
I mention all this with reference to interdisciplinary research projects. A recent survey published in Science Careers (L. Bonetta, The Evolving Post Doctoral Experience, Science Careers, 2009) revealed many interesting statistics which I could blog lyrical about. The one that struck me the most was that 39% of supervisors said that there current postdoc is what they would consider 'outstanding.' Now Science Careers say that 'only 39%' are considered outstanding and I'm not sure personally if that over a third being outstanding is a bad or good number. The point that they made is that this was a drop from the previous survey in 2007 from 45 %. One explanation for this drop was explained by David Kreil, Boku University, Vienna, "It is rare to find postdocs with really strong skills in both life sciences and in a technical area."
Is it right that postdocs should not been deemed excellent because they are no longer specialists but gleaning a limited amount of various skills across disciplines? Is this not the fodder of grant proposals and the aid to a flurry of ideas? Should there be a more factory line process e.g. chemist, biologist, pharmacist, it didn't work, start again?
With regards to my own research, I think it is imperative to understand my work completely, to create a flow of good ideas and how the research translates. Being capable of doing that to the level I want to is extremely challenging. I have tried attending undergraduate pharmacy classes but it is not always possible to fit them in and I have been trying to read pharmacology and physiology textbooks (Cheers G-is the liver really that important?). I need to be realistic about what I need to know, form some questions, talk to the specialists and hopefully get pointed in the right direction.
My biggest worry about being a jack of all trades is when the time comes to move to a new job: sum yourself up in 3 words...'good all rounder.' Employable?
I particularly like knowing a wee bit about all the areas to do with my research. My task over the next 2 years is to become outstandingly non-specialised!
Sarah
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)